Arthur Bowen Davies exhibition reviewed by Piri Halasz

Arthur Bowen Davies: Painter, Poet, Romancer & Mystic

Arthur Bowen Davies (1862-1928), "Children Playing," ca. 1896, oil on canvas, 18 x 22 inches

View the Davies exhibition   |   View the online catalogue PDF   |   Read the A.B. Davies biography

We are pleased to share the following excerpt from Piri Halasz’s review of Arthur Bowen Davies: Painter, Poet, Romancer & Mystic, posted on her blog, (An Appropriate Distance) From the Mayor’s Doorstep, on April 13, 2012.

RE-UNITING HUMPTY DUMPTY

Arthur B. Davies has long puzzled me. In grad school, I learned that he’d been one of “The Eight” painters whose “radical” 1908 group show at the Macbeth Gallery ushered in 20th century American art. I also learned that he’d played a major role in organizing the original (and more genuinely radical) Armory Show of 1913, but the paintings by him that I saw in the histories of American art, of pretty-pretty nudes in fantasy landscapes, sometimes accompanied by unicorns, made him look like a cross between the later & more academic Pre-Raphaelites and French Salon painters like Puvis de Chavannes. In other words, he seemed like Humpty Dumpty, who had somewhere along the line fallen off a wall and broken into two halves, one dedicated to modernist theory and the other to retardataire practice. Hence, my surprise and delight at the group of 16 small to very small paintings by Davies assembled in one of Spanierman’s similarly small but ornately furnished viewing rooms at the back of the gallery. The works on display are all moderately to very informal paintings, most more like studies for larger paintings or sketches sur le motif, but in all the oils, the brushwork reveals itself to be looser and more impressionistic than any of the reproductions I’ve seen indicate, more modern in other words (given that in the early years of the 20th century, impressionism was still a moderately recent style).

“The Horn Players” (ca. 1893), a vignette of orchestra musicians, is reminiscent of Manet or Degas its subject & rich, dark tonalities — and closer to the more Old Masterly realists among The Eight, John Sloan and Robert Henri. The decorative, pattern-like “Children Playing” (ca. 1896) reminds me of another and equally modern member of The Eight, Maurice Prendergast. Some of the watercolor Davies studies of the Italian Apennines from the 1920s are yet more faithful to their subjects, offering a breath of fresh mountain air to this otherwise somewhat claustrophobic little gallery, but what I found even more revealing was the “Figures in a Landscape” (ca. 1912). This modest oil, only 23¾ x 28¼ inches, somewhat crudely portrays an orgy-like group of three nude couples in a woodland setting; it reminded me vividly of the small studies of groups of bathers by Cézanne that were so much in vogue among avant-garde artists and collectors in the early years of the 20th century (and which accordingly figure prominently in the current show of “The Steins Collect” at the Met). Even more daring — in concept if not execution – is the “Life Study (Interior)” (ca. 1910), an oil which depicts a standing female nude with faint tints of green in the shadowed parts of her flesh. These suggest to me that Davies had been admiring Matisse, even if he didn’t dare emulate him to the fullest. True, this exhibition also includes paintings that don’t go much beyond 19th century Symbolism, but leaving those aside, its main thrust is to bring together Davies’ avant-garde theory with his actual painting practice, re-uniting the two halves of Humpty Dumpty after nearly a century apart.

Also see the view at www.pirihalasz.com.

View the exhibition   |   View the online catalogue PDF   |   Read the A.B. Davies biography


Children’s Pleasures: Arthur B. Davies, On Loan

Arthur B. Davies, "Children Playing," ca. 1900, oil on canvas, 18 x 22 in.

Arthur B. Davies, "Children Playing," ca. 1900, oil on canvas, 18 x 22 in.

Lisa N. Peters

Along with J. G. Brown’s The Coquette (ca. 1870s), the gallery lent Arthur B. Davies’s Children Playing (ca. 1902) to the exhibition, Children’s Pleasures: American Celebrations of Childhood, on view at the Hofstra University Museum, Hempstead (February 2-April 18, 2010) (see previous post).  A member of the Eight, Davies diverged in his art from his colleagues.  Whereas the others in the group—such as Robert Henri, John Sloan, and George Luks—focused on recording their immediate responses to the dynamic qualities of turn-of-the-twentieth-century New York life—as revealed especially in their views of bursting tenement districts and crowded public gathering places—Davies preferred to depict Arcadian landscapes frequented by idealized figures and expressing mythological themes. (Read the New York Times review on the exhibition by Benjamin Genocchio. PDF version) Read the rest of this entry »

Ashcan School – Part III

Ashcan School continued . . . Now that some issues of this quite confusing term have been addressed, it’s time to turn to the question of . . . what is it that makes an Ashcan School work, which seems less confusingWhat can be said in brief is that, instead of the genteel subjects painted by American artists inspired by French Impressionism, whose urban views generally consisted of the parks and squares frequented by the wealthy, Ashcan images depicted the new realities of urban experience in the early twentieth century, which meant that their creators (or the New York Realists) did not shy away from capturing the gritty, crude, and seamy aspects of New York life, not neglecting evidence of the disparities in social rank that were apparent during a day of dramatic immigration, a burgeoning lower class, dense neighborhoods bursting with tenements where laundry lines crisscrossed over dark alleyways, and urban crowding. They also painted the novelties of modern life in the city. They portrayed crowded street scenes where the El train rumbled overhead (the full awareness of the misery caused by these noisy tracks clanking overhead and dripping oil on pedestrians was not yet at the forefront in the 1910s), Chinese restaurants (a new phenomenon of New York life then—imagine that!), boxing matches (this was the prehistoric age of American professional sports), and children sledding in Central Park (it was a new idea then that children should have free time, the concept that is now destroying our lives—or at least mine), and yes, occasionally, vagrants picking through garbage left on the street. Read the rest of this entry »

Ashcan School – Part I

Lisa N. Peters
(Read Ashcan School-Part II and Ashcan School-Part III)
Focus on the Ashcan School. . . . hmm. We currently have an online Ashcan School show on our website, so the question came up of what exactly is the Ashcan School????I will try to answer this question as succinctly as possible in a three-part post series.

This so-called “school” refers to a group of artists who painted gritty, vital views of many strata of New York City life in the early twentieth century.

Yet there’s a problem: the Ashcan School was not only never literally a “school,” but it also never consisted of an organized group of artists. Because of this, to my mind, it seems more reasonable to use the term “Ashcan School” to refer to works that fit certain criteria associated with this school rather than to try to assign this label to certain artists. Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.