Mind, Body, and Spirit in the Art of Elliott Daingerfield

Lisa N. Peters

An artist who was also a prominent teacher and an articulate writer,* Elliott Daingerfield (1859-1932) is associated with American Tonalism and held to the attitudes of this movement in his view that the role of the artist was to perceive and understand the beautiful, rather than simply to represent extrinsic fact.  With his friend George Inness, whose studio was near his in New York’s Holbein building, he shared a desire to capture spiritual essences in nature, expressing the idea that even the simplest manifestation of nature was a visible sign of God’s presence.

He was one of few artists of his time to paint religious subjects, often portraying them to express themes of universal human emotion.  This is apparent in Madonna and Child, where maternal affection is conveyed through the glowing light that passes between mother and infant.

In Two Women the lithe forms of the sprite-like figures exude nature’s aliveness, which for Daingerfield manifested the working spirit of God, bringing life to man and nature alike.

Garden of Eden seemed to glow forth at me when I pulled out the vertical rack in the back bins on which it is hung.  It conveys the warmth, lushness, and contentment of such Arcadian places where our consciousness is heightened of the beauty in nature and of its underlying spirit.  At the same time, the rich greens in the painting and the Grecian structure in the right distance, suggest that Daingerfield was drawing inspiration for this scene from Blowing Rock, his home and property in the Blue Ridge Mountains of his native North Carolina, where he spent long, pleasurable summers with his wife and two daughters.  Today his former residence, built in the Greek Revival style, is the home of the Westglow Resort & Spa, a luxury spa that offers “a perfect place to find renewal of the mind, body, and spirit.”  Westglow’s existence thankfully assures the preservation of Daingerfield’s home, while also revealing that the need for such renewal–which Daingerfield expressed in his art–is still with us. All three works by Daingerfield will be included in Summer Selections, to be held at the gallery July 22-September 3, 2010.

J. Francis Murphy, "The Brook," 1880s, oil on canvas, 7 3/4 x 14 1/4 inches

J. Francis Murphy, "The Brook," 1880s, oil on canvas, 7 3/4 x 14 1/4 inches

*Among Daingerfield’s writings on fellow American artists is an article of 1917 on his friend J. Francis Murphy (1853-1921), the subject of our current exhibition.  Daingerfield wrote that the exacting work of Murphy, developed through close study and a sincere commitment to staying his course, represented a “beautiful seeing” all too often overlooked by a public used to the pace of “modern life,” which “moves too fast to endure this.” Daingerfield stated that in his work Murphy “does not ask us to imagine anything—rather he says simply: ‘I was walking across the fields to-day—the sky was very soft and fleecy, more tone than form or color, and the light over the grass near the little stream was very lovely, and that group of slender, sober birches was so delightful against the light that I have brought it all home to show to you.’”  Such an experience is, indeed, felt in observing the Murphys hanging now in the gallery, such as The Brook.  [Scribner's 61 (February 1917), 127-30]

 

Research in Progress: Eaton Detective Work Brings Results!

Charles Warren Eaton, "La Nuit (The Night)," oil on canvas, 35 1/2 x 44 1/2 inches, signed and dated lower left: "Chas. Warren Eaton 1911"

Charles Warren Eaton, "La Nuit (The Night)," oil on canvas, 35 1/2 x 44 1/2 inches, signed and dated lower left: "Chas. Warren Eaton 1911"

Lisa N. Peters

Among the rewards of working in the gallery are the discoveries made in the course of research. These often occur in the process of organizing exhibitions, when works included receive more scrutiny than they would otherwise.  Such sleuth work invariably involves several of us, as was the case when a new painting by Charles Warren Eaton arrived for our current show, fresh from the large holdings of Eaton’s art that belong to the granddaughter of the artist Samuel Foster, who had become close to Eaton during Eaton’s youth in Albany, New York.  

The painting hung quietly in the owner’s front foyer for decades.  Large in size for Eaton, and including the dark silhouettes of lonely pine trees set against a nocturnal landscape lit by the glimmer of moonlight that constitute Eaton’s signature statement, the painting (which came to us untitled and seemingly undated) struck us as one that the artist might have used to represent himself in an important venue.   Read the rest of this entry »

Branching Out (Literally): Paintings by Charles Warren Eaton

Lisa N. Peters

Eaton photo

Charles Warren Eaton, photograph from "Centennial Anniversary of 'The Pine Tree Artist,'" "East Orange Record," March 14, 1957.

American landscape painters at the turn of the twentieth century are usually divided into those who followed in the mode of the French Impressionists and those who adhered to the style known as American Tonalism.  The chance to see the differences in these approaches is made possible by the exhibition opening at the gallery on December 8, which pairs the art of Charles Warren Eaton (1857-1937), who worked in a Tonalist idiom, with that of Robert Emmett Owen (1878-1957), who used an Impressionist method.  At the same time, in the example of these two artists, the exhibition demonstrates the ways in which American artists often crossed over between the two styles and found their own voices in response to their subjects.

Eaton, who was twenty-one years younger than Owen, held a deep admiration for the work of George Inness, and was among few of Inness’s many followers to develop a personal relationship with this artist who is generally considered the progenitor of Tonalism.  Apparently Inness returned the appreciation, as he stopped in Eaton’s studio one day, and finding the younger artist out, came back the next day to buy one of Eaton’s paintings.  For a time, Eaton even shared his studio with Inness in Montclair, New Jersey. Eaton was also part of a community of Inness disciples in Bloomfield, New Jersey. Read the rest of this entry »

Autumn Landscape: The Tonalist and Impressionist Point of View


John Francis Murphy
Autumnal Landscape
(possibly Arkville, NY), 1898
Carol Lowrey

My recent blog on Emile Gruppé’s Vermont scenes (coupled with a pleasant drive upstate), has prompted some further musings on autumn landscapes by American painters. However, this time, I’m going slightly back in time to peruse some Tonalist and Impressionist pictures from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

Charles Warren Eaton
November, Montclair, ca. 1890s
The writer George Eliot described autumn as a “delicious” time of year and rightly so, in view of its colorful foliage and golden atmosphere, which appealed to artists with a love of nature and an intuitive approach to painting. This was certainly true of J. Francis Murphy (1853-1921), Charles Warren Eaton (1857-1937) and Bruce Crane (1857-1937) , who were associated with Tonalism, a very suggestive mode of painting that became fashionable during the 1880s. Preoccupied with conveying mood, Tonalists liked autumn because it was a transitional time of year––a much more poetic season than summer. Painted at contemplative times of day such as dawn and dusk and in varying types of weather, their fall landscapes typically feature isolated rural locales which they depicted with a limited palette of harmonious colors and with expressive brushwork that made forms blurry and indistinct––an approach that imbued their work with a gentle lyricism and a feeling of relaxation. I’m not at all surprised that Tonalist landscapes found their way into the parlors and dining rooms of contemporary collectors such as William T. Evans and George Hearn, providing them with a welcome visual refuge from their harried lives in the New York business world. Read the rest of this entry »
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.